For those who now have a P3 and also use CW Skimmer in one form or another, how do the waterfall displays compare on CW for resolution and scroll rate? I often use CW Skimmer in "blind" mode with just the audio feed from my K3 to provide a running visual CW display (about 12 to 15 seconds on my monitor) in case I miss part of a contest exchange. It's clumsy and MUCH less effective in general than copying by ear, but it sometimes helps me avoid asking for a repeat if I miss a character. Of all the various non-SDR applications I tried that are capable of displaying a waterfall (Spectrogram, DigiPan, MixW, MultiPSK, etc) CW Skimmer was heads above the rest, but the recent comments about the sharpness of the P3 display make me wonder if the P3 is potentially better in spite of the smaller screen. With CW Skimmer, visual copy above roughly 35 wpm gets pretty dicey.
73, Dave AB7E ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
