David Gilbert wrote: > > Of all the various non-SDR applications I tried that are capable of > displaying a waterfall (Spectrogram, DigiPan, MixW, MultiPSK, etc) CW > Skimmer was heads above the rest, but the recent comments about the > sharpness of the P3 display make me wonder if the P3 is potentially > better in spite of the smaller screen. With CW Skimmer, visual copy > above roughly 35 wpm gets pretty dicey. >
With very careful adjustment of the P3's Ref Lvl and Scale, some dots and dashes can be made visible. Skimmer is much better at this and the display works with no adjustments necessary. I believe Alex VE3NEA is using some AGC to adjust for varying noise conditions and signal levels. My decoder is much better than either, but it's not for sale. ;-) 73, Bill -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/P3-Waterfall-Resolution-tp5430132p5431616.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
