I too would like to see details of the improvement over LPan etc. I am a long time user of SDR/computer panadapters for use in detecting very weak signals at UHF/VHF/microwave. I use a Softrock on the K3 IF port since I got my K3 a year ago. I have yet to see one report regarding weak sig detection with the P3 after many requests to the initial testers of the P3. ANYONE out there looking for weak weak sigs with a P3??
73 Bill K0AWU EN37ed --------------- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:00:52 -0400 > Subject: [Elecraft] LP Pan versus P3 Panadapters > > > To All, > > Can you please provide comments on the LP Pan versus the P3 Panadapter on the > K3. > > The LP Pan seems to have a lot more features compared to the P3 and the cost > is so much less. > > I understand that the LP Pan requires a PC but you get a bigger screen when > using a PC. > > What makes the P3 better then the LP Pan for the K3, if it is ? > > Thank you ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
