Bill, I cannot say anything about the comparison of weak signals on the waterfall between the two, but one great advantage of the P3 is the ability to adjust the span - you can go from observing a 200 kHz chunk of the band (-100 kHz to +100 kHz) to a width that will allow you to examine a single signal in detail.
73, Don W3FPR On 9/14/2010 12:01 AM, Bill Davis Jr wrote: > I too would like to see details of the improvement over LPan etc. I am a > long time user of SDR/computer panadapters for use in detecting very weak > signals at UHF/VHF/microwave. I use a Softrock on the K3 IF port since I got > my K3 a year ago. I have yet to see one report regarding weak sig detection > with the P3 after many requests to the initial testers of the P3. ANYONE out > there looking for weak weak sigs with a P3?? > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
