Mike, They are both done in the DSP IF, not at audio. They are two different ways of achieving the same thing. I use width and shift for CW, but use HI/LO cut for SSB. As you indicated, the voice signal retains intelligibility if only HI cut is changed, but looses intelligibility quickly as the LO cut is move much above 300 Hz.
73, Don W3FPR On 10/29/2010 7:40 PM, Mike Rodgers wrote: > It was mentioned in the roofing or if filter post that using hi/lo cut was > easier than bandwidth shift. That you can see the filters change as you bring > hi cut down. > I thought width and shift was in the I F and cut in the audio. Are they > essentially the same or have the same effect ? > > Signed confused > > Happy QSO'ing. Mike R > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
