No, it wouldn't. A wiki wouldn't be organized any better than the current K3 manual. The K3 manual suffers less from not having enough important information than it does from being structured like it was written by an engineer who felt he had more important things to do.
73, Dave AB7E On 12/7/2010 9:58 AM, [email protected] wrote: > What happened to the K3 wiki? Wouldn't that be a good place for users to > develop a "handbook?" > > Buck > k4ia > K3 #101 > > In a message dated 12/7/2010 11:54:18 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > For all of those that asked for it on here I have sent a series of 5 > documents regarding some of the K3 NB/NR etc. Tools. I hope that was > helpful to > you. If there are others that would like a copy please send me mail off > the reflector. Thank you, 73, > > Michael > N6MQL > (assigned) > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
