No need to limit ourselves to only 11 dimensions, Occam's razor be damned. I would simply resort to Shannon's trick and employ the fact that in a hypershpere of VERY high dimensionality nearly all of the volume lies very close to the surface... Only, I'm quite busy at the moment trying to figure out how to hook up this big screen tv so will leave the details as an exercise for the reader.
73.579545 Drew AF2Z On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 18:47:11 -0800, you wrote: >Interesting discussion. Gives me an idea. > >We'll soon be announcing a very cool new test instrument (it's the same size >as our T1 antenna tuner but not related to it in any way). We'll give one of >these to whoever can suggest, by next Thursday, the most plausible alternative >to 11-dimensional supersymmetry as the working basis for a unified field >theory. You may assume a negative cosmological constant and cannot impose >R-parity. If the Higgs boson is discovered before the new product >announcement, we'll throw in a spare 9-V battery. > >73.14159..., > >Wayne >N6KR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
