Bill, This is the first posting on this subject that I understand. hi,hi 73, Bob K6UJ
On Mar 7, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Bill wrote: > Sounds to me like a rectal-cranial inversion would do the trick. > > Bill > K9YEQ > > -----Original Message----- > > On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 18:47:11 -0800, you wrote: > >> Interesting discussion. Gives me an idea. >> >> We'll soon be announcing a very cool new test instrument (it's the same > size as our T1 antenna tuner but not related to it in any way). We'll give > one of these to whoever can suggest, by next Thursday, the most plausible > alternative to 11-dimensional supersymmetry as the working basis for a > unified field theory. You may assume a negative cosmological constant and > cannot impose R-parity. If the Higgs boson is discovered before the new > product announcement, we'll throw in a spare 9-V battery. >> >> 73.14159..., >> >> Wayne >> N6KR > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
