Hi Phil, The KX1 and K1 were both optimized for low current drain, with receivers based on active mixers (Gilbert-cell multipliers) and low- level signal sources. So it's a bit of an apples/oranges comparison. But both were reviewed by QST magazine, so you can look up the ARRL's official test results. These are usually very close to Sherwood's.
73, Wayne N6KR On Apr 5, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Phil Hystad wrote: > I am curious on how the KX1 and K1 receivers match up to the K2 and > the K3. I mean, what if these were put in the Sherwood Engineering > list (I didn't see them there). Where would they fall > (approximately)? > > 73, phil, K7PEH > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
