Thanks Wayne, Even though I do not know the implication of a Gilbert-cell multiplier or low level signal sources, I have just now downloaded the QST reviews and will be reading these in bed tonight on my iPad.
phil On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > Hi Phil, > > The KX1 and K1 were both optimized for low current drain, with receivers > based on active mixers (Gilbert-cell multipliers) and low-level signal > sources. So it's a bit of an apples/oranges comparison. But both were > reviewed by QST magazine, so you can look up the ARRL's official test > results. These are usually very close to Sherwood's. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Phil Hystad wrote: > >> I am curious on how the KX1 and K1 receivers match up to the K2 and the K3. >> I mean, what if these were put in the Sherwood Engineering list (I didn't >> see them there). Where would they fall (approximately)? >> >> 73, phil, K7PEH >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
