On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Mike Rodgers <[email protected]> wrote: > If there is consensus to change, I propose the possibility of 14.305. > It's lightly used as far as I know. There are nets during the week from the > "beautiful day net" at 9&2 central time > And some Saturday's. There's the west coast prestigious group net at 1pm > central. Not sure if they are on the weekend. Some of you west coasties may > know. Other than that it's fairly quiet. The 24hr maritime net is far enough > away at 14.300. Sometimes QRM from 14.307.5. If 14.304 would be far enough > from the maritime net, then itwould be better in case of activity on 14.307.5. > >
I know I might be in the minority but I complained about these tones to Phil last week. I have twice to get in on this net and its untenable at 14.316. I guess I am confused. Why is it so hard to get a relatively free'ish frequency at 2PM EST on 20m again (I guess above 14.225)? -aps (KC2ZSX) ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
