But, then again, it is easy to view the K-line as one system and thus having one software application to manage your K-line makes sense. I am also a computer programmer with 40+ years in the industry and I would prefer one application. I do understand the need to support those who do not have all the pieces but this too can be done with a single application.
Soon, there will be a software driven antenna tuner to add to the mix. I am thinking that one application could be beneficial as a user. It is easily to lose track of close to a half-dozen different little apps -- especially when you do not use them all that much. My two-bit comment, 73, phil, K7PEH On May 15, 2011, at 9:47 AM, K2GN wrote: > Having spent 30+ years in data process it is common to keep your hardware > supporting software separated. A utility for each is the way to go. Hard > drive storage is cheap, It's just a matter of organize your support software > and accessing it when needed. > There's no need to clutter a desktop with everything. These utilities are > not part of our day to day operation. I prefer not to have combined > software. > > > de K2GN - Larry - http://k2gn.com > K-Line - K3 S/N - 3278 P3 S/N - 51 KPA500(Tomorrow delivery) W2s > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
