The advantage of the N1MM voice keyer is that it will automatically send the next message depending on where you are in the logging sequence. You can also go so far as to record individual letters and it will string them together to "say" callsigns and incremental QSO numbers. Its a lot of work to do that trick but it can be done.
If you use the K3DVK, you have to take your hands off the keyboard to punch a button on the front panel of the radio and your number of available messages is much more limited. And, the N1MM voice keyer is free. Buck k4ia K3 # 101 On 9/3/2011 9:46 PM, DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL wrote: > Hi... > > I am a fossil using CT on DOS. I am now upgrading and am wondering > about using the N1MM "DVK" option versus or in conjunction with the > K3DVK (which I do not yet own). > > I suggest that you reply off-reflector; that is, directly to me, but > clearly, "your choice." > > 1. If you utilize the "DVK" in N1MM instead of the K3DVK, please > discuss that with me > > 2. If you utilize N1MM to key the K3DVK please discuss that with me. > > 3. Something else? > > I'd like to know "why" in each case. > > Thanks, > de Doug KR2Q > > I dislike phone, but love contesting..maybe this will help. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
