k6dgw wrote: > > > Well ... not really so. The K3DVR has a number of advantages, the > largest by far is that when you play your messages recorded with your > microphone, they sound *exactly* like you're live, down to whatever > background noise you have in your shack. Level, compression, and TX EQ > are identical to your mic audio. A large number of recorded CQ's and > exchanges in SSB contests are more or less unintelligible. Usually way > over driven, way too much compression, and restricted audio spectrum. > Such is not the case with the K3DVR. > >
The same can be true when using N1MM and a soundcard: set it up so that the mic runs into the COMPUTER audio input. Because the audio is running in the same path (through the computer) for both recorded messages and live mic use it sounds EXACTLY the same for both. I don't operate SSB contests that much but I just use N1MM and a soundcard because it is cheaper than buying the K3DVR. I use a simple (1 transistor) homebrew mic preamp between the microphone (Heil dynamic headset) and the computer audio in. Audio out from the computer goes straight to the back of the K3. Tor N4OGW -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-Contesters-using-N1MM-voice-keyer-versus-K3DVK-tp6757603p6759514.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
