You're right, Vic. We'll be posting in greater detail on this topic shortly.
Wayne N6KR On Dec 8, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Vic K2VCO wrote: > I t's been shown conclusively that an unbalanced 'floating' tuner > with a balun on the > input does not provide better balance than one with the balun on the > output. Yes, I know > that there is such a tuner in the ARRL handbook and Alpha is > manufacturing one. But the > math doesn't lie. So unless Elecraft wanted to use a balanced > network -- which would make > the tuner MUCH more expensive -- I would prefer one without a balun. > Then those who do not > use balanced lines would not have to pay for the balun. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
