Hi Joe,

I thought about this a fair bit.  Changed USB hubs here a few weeks
ago and the new one is A LOT faster.  I think it's possible that
serial is running through with fewer inter-command delays and also
with little time between characters.

Using the old, slower USB hub confirms the difference.  Really, after
all is said, this means the RMS Express program needs better testing
and probably a re-code of the Elecraft Radios TNC driver.

Thanks for your ideas.  

73,
matt W6NIA


On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:30:49 -0500, you wrote:

>
>> Basically, I can't find the source of this "bug", because everything
>> looks fine from the computer side.
>
>I believe you will find the "bug" in the order in which RMS Express
>sends the commands to the rig.  Changing mode after setting frequency
>and changing data dub-mode after setting frequency *can* result in
>offsets.  In particular, if the digital mode was AFSK or FSK (DT1;
>or DT2;) switching to DATA A (DT0;) will result in frequency change.
>The magnitude of that change will depend on the selected RTTY MARK
>frequency.
>
>Note particularly that the displayed frequency does not change but
>the carrier oscillator (and sideband) do change when switching from
>AFSK A to DATA A.
>
>73,
>
>    ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
>On 1/2/2012 10:13 AM, Matt Zilmer wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> Thanks.  The several MARS frequency matrix docs show center freq of
>> the 3 KHz channel.  However, RMS Express compensates for this by
>> subtracting 1.5 KHz so that the suppressed carrier frequency is sent,
>> via the FA command.
>>
>> Example:
>> [CXR freq: 7059.0, center is shown as 7060.5]
>>
>>    FA000007059000;
>>
>> I already instrumented this with Portmon, and it's correct.  My
>> interest here is to find a reason the K3 is set 1.5 KHz higher than
>> the CXR freq, but on RX only.  The TX freq is correct (the RMS replies
>> to initial call-ups).  Basically, I can't find the source of this
>> "bug", because everything looks fine from the computer side.
>>
>> 73,
>> matt W6NIA / NNN0UET
>>
>> On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 17:09:21 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> What does your frequency matrix say for "center of channel" and
>>> what is RMS Express setting for DATA A dial (USB carrier) frequency?
>>>
>>> In DATA A, the dial frequency is identical to the USB carrier
>>> frequency.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>>     ... Joe, W4TV
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/1/2012 4:25 PM, Matt Zilmer wrote:
>>>> Thanks, Joe.  I've been with MARS for a few years now and understand
>>>> the "channel center" frequency matrix.
>>>>
>>>> This is a case where the string setting the K3's carrier freq is
>>>> setting the correct value.  There is something odd at work here.
>>>>
>>>> matt
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 15:47:51 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I verified that the software is setting the correct carrier freq,
>>>>>> based on the center freq cited by the MARS frequency matrix.  I was
>>>>>> thinking along the same lines as your suggestion below.
>>>>>
>>>>> Standard practice in government operation - including MARS in recent
>>>>> years - is to specify the "center of channel" and *not* the USB dial
>>>>> frequency.  The two frequencies will differ by 1400 to 1500 Hz based
>>>>> on the particular assumptions used for the transmitter with 1500 Hz
>>>>> being slightly more common.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect you will find your MARS matrix specifies "center of channel"
>>>>> for all digital and any remaining CW networks while still giving USB
>>>>> suppressed carrier frequency for voice networks.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73,
>>>>>
>>>>>      ... Joe, W4TV
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/1/2012 2:25 PM, Matt Zilmer wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks for your reply, Bill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I verified that the software is setting the correct carrier freq,
>>>>>> based on the center freq cited by the MARS frequency matrix.  I was
>>>>>> thinking along the same lines as your suggestion below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I use program control to set the freq, then I get TX + 1.5 KHz =
>>>>>> RX.  This is with split disabled and RIT / XIT turned off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Temporarily, I'm manually setting the carrier freq to 1.5 KHz below
>>>>>> center instead of relying on the control program to do this.  That
>>>>>> solved the problem, but doesn't explain why the radio has carrier freq
>>>>>> centered on the freq only under program control.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mysteries....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>> matt W6NIA / NNN0UET
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 13:21:51 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, this is normal for digital mode DATA A.  I'm not familiar with 
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>> particular software, but for PSK31 and similar modes, the K3 VFO A is 
>>>>>>> set to
>>>>>>> a frequency for the carrier.  The audio is on the upper sideband, and is
>>>>>>> centered in the 3 KHz passband which is 1.5kHz up from the carrier.  
>>>>>>> Thus
>>>>>>> the offset.  Some digital software has an allowance for an offset, but 
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> not sure about yours.  You might check on this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Typically if operating on 20 meters with radio set to 14.070MHz, the
>>>>>>> waterfall will be full of traces at audio frequencies spread across the
>>>>>>> passband of your radio.  So you actual transmission freq is the sum of 
>>>>>>> VFO
>>>>>>> plus the audio.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...bill  nr4c
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Matt Zilmer [mailto:mzil...@verizon.net]
>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2012 11:31 AM
>>>>>>> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>> Subject: [Elecraft] K3: data modes - bizarre behavior
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In all this time with K3 #24, I've never been stymied by any issue
>>>>>>> such as described below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm a Navy-Marine Corps MARS member.  We use RMS Express in the WL2K
>>>>>>> system on HF, running WL2K Winmor mode  The software I have is version
>>>>>>> 1.1.3.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I also use LP Bridge to create two COM ports: one used for DTR (PTT)
>>>>>>> and the other for control, COM19 and COM20 respectively.  The sound
>>>>>>> card is an EMU 0202.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem is this:  When RMS Express takes control of the K3,
>>>>>>> calling an RMS node on HF *always* results in the receive frequency
>>>>>>> being 1.5 KHz too high.  I've had to rotate the RIT between call-up
>>>>>>> transmissions to get the RX on frequency before the initial 5 attempts
>>>>>>> time out.  The TX frequency seems dead-on, because the RMS always
>>>>>>> answers - but RX is 1.5 KHz high.  And yes, I've tested with multiple
>>>>>>> RMS nodes, including my own NMCM RMS here at the shack.  Same problem
>>>>>>> occurs with each, so it's a setup issue with software or the K3 here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RMS Express sends the following commands after it's set the COM20 comm
>>>>>>> parameters:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         FR0;    # cancel split
>>>>>>>         RT0;    # RIT OFF
>>>>>>>         XT0;    # XIT OFF
>>>>>>>         MD6;    # TX DATA mode
>>>>>>>         DT0;    # DATA A sub-mode of TX DATA
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The sequence above is sent once at the beginning of an RMS Express
>>>>>>> call-up of the remote node.  Only COM19's DTR is used to assert PTT
>>>>>>> for transmissions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just for grins, I checked the various meta-modes the K3 is in.  I
>>>>>>> discovered that even though AI is set to ZERO, I'm still getting IF
>>>>>>> annunciations back from the K3.  Odd, that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         K31;    # K3 extended commands enabled
>>>>>>>         K22;    # K2 extended " "
>>>>>>>         AI0;    # AUTOINF OFF
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since split and the incremental controls are off and ZEROed, I'm
>>>>>>> totally blind to what's going on.  VFO A is on the correct frequency
>>>>>>> in each case (for each RMS Node), which means to me that RX and TX
>>>>>>> actual frequencies should be the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any ideas what's causing this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73 and HNY,
>>>>>>> matt W6NIA, NNN0UET
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to