On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:25 PM, David Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: >...Most of the MFJ tuners tend to rank pretty low ... =========== QST hasn't reviewed the 998, but they did have a review of the MFJ 994 back in 2006. Tested across all bands and a range of impedances, it generally showed lower losses than the other similar autotuners tested, made by Palstar and LDG. There is a mini-review of the 998 by list member AD5X at:
http://www.ad5x.com/images/Presentations/MFJ998%20Review%20RevA.pdf but it doesn't include loss measurements. Other than the loss measurements for the 994 mentioned above, which looked pretty good, I can't find any other measured results for MFJ auto-tuners. Tony KT0NY -- http://www.isb.edu/faculty/facultydir.aspx?ddlFaculty=352 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
