QST had an article a while back comparing tuners, MFJ, Palomar, Drake and several others if I remember correctly. They had a chart showing the loss per band per each tuner. They included the old Johnson Viking matchbox in their ranking too. The old Johnson was right up there in the top rankings, with very low loss. I wish I still had my old Johnson, sigh............... Anyway a search on the ARRL webpage for QST articles about tuners should show the article.
Bob K6UJ On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:10 PM, W5RDW wrote: > Never had any reason to wonder if my MFJ-998 has more than normal loss. It > hasn't let any smoke out of the cabinet yet! I use to run a Drake L-7 thru > it, but now use the KPA500 all the time and have retired the Drake. > >> /Most of the MFJ tuners tend to rank pretty low in that respect./ > > Dave, I'd be interested in reading about the info you have on the MFJ tuner > loss. > > ----- > Roger W5RDW > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/high-power-tuner-tp7314904p7359740.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
