"...just because there's no data, it doesn't mean you're wrong" Einstein (probably)
Sent from my iPad On Apr 25, 2012, at 8:47 PM, "Fred Jensen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Tony, you forgot one, there's > > 5. Proof by Powerpoint. > > 73, > > Fred K6DGW > - Northern California Contest Club > - CU in the 2012 Cal QSO Party 6-7 Oct 2012 > - www.cqp.org > > On 4/25/2012 4:55 PM, Tony Estep wrote: > >> Ah, Alan, you are a repeat offender. However, do not feel bad. Contrary to >> what you may have heard, recently certain philosophers have concluded that >> objective data is not always bad. They argue that it is in fact one of the >> four basic categories of acceptable standards of proof: >> >> 1. proof by handwaving/buzzword invocation/TABLE-POUNDING >> 2. proof by appeal to authority/expertise/experience/common sense/universal >> knowledge >> 3. proof by mathematical or other rigorous analysis >> 4. proof by experimental data > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
