For serious contest use of the K2 on 160, I found that the extra skirt depth afforded by the DSP was extremely useful when running as opposed to search and pounce. On the other hand the easy rolloff of audio off the center frequency was useful. Like some others what I really wanted was BOTH.
73, Guy. On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:50 PM, David Pratt <[email protected]>wrote: > Just my opinion having used both, Steve, but if you are primarily a CW > operator I think you would be better off with the KAF2. > > 73 DE David G4DMP > > In a recent message, Stephen Roberts <[email protected]> writes > >Well going from a rather ancient Ten Tec to a K2 has been a real treat > >for sure, and as most of us can't seem to be able to leave anything > >well enough alone, I was thinking about possible options I can add > >without breaking the bank. Can any of you folks tell me the real life > >difference between these two options and whether or not either one of > >them is worth the expense? I do almost no voice...all cw. > -- > + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + > | David M Pratt, Kippax, Leeds. | > | Website: http://www.g4dmp.co.uk | > + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
