For my operating style (DX-ing, contesting that serious contesters would consider "casual", mostly CW), the filtering capabilities of the basic K2 are way more than adequate. Using the N-GEN + Spectrogram procedure for filter setup works extremely well and I almost never found myself wishing for "more filtering" during recent ARRL CW DX and CQWW CW contests. The K2 is already so much quieter than its predecessor (a Kenwood TS850) that I don't really feel the need to add the noise quieting benefits of either the KDSP2 or KAF2.
- Bruce ----- Bruce Rosen K1FFX K2/100 6982 -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KAF2-or-KDSP2-for-K2-tp7517325p7520623.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html