Gary, No problem - my goal is that no one become confused because of terminology.
What you report is great news. This has been a mystifying thing at Elecraft for some time because of the difficulties of testing the results of any changes. Thank you for your efforts and comments. 73, Don W3FPR On 5/6/2012 7:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > *Don, > > Correct...forgive me for the *brain fade*...yes the new adjustment IS for > the onset of AGC as you point out. My observations still remain as stated. > > Apologies to the grout for my tardiness in explaining what I am > seeing/hearing. > > I will repeat that the muddiness I had before is now not apparent, at least > to a level that it was and signals are now much easier to make out. > > There are some limitations with this FW but that is also being looked at by > Elecraft but I will leave that for the folks at Elecraft to explain. > > Regards, > Gary > > * > On 7 May 2012 08:21, Don Wilhelm<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Gary, >> >> All you said is true --- BUT >> >> I am not trying to be argumentative, but the AGC adjustment that has had >> the range increased is the "Threshold" and not the "delay" I would not >> necessarily bring this up, but there *is* a menu setting for AGC DLY, and I >> do not wish to see owners confused between the Threshold and the Delay. >> >> In simplistic terms, the "Threshold" is the RF level at which the AGC >> begins to be active. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
