Note: The noise blanker in NaP3 works on the display as well. Larry N8LP
Ignacy wrote > > I guess that one can find advantages of P3, LP-Pan or something else > depending on circumstances. > > The main advantage of P3 is that it is standalone. No hassles of software > installation, instantaneous turn on, and excellent integration with K3. > But since the P3's the firmware is proprietary, it is modified dependent > on Elecraft's priorities. > > For instance, a feature I am missing the most in P3 is noise blanker. > Under heavy power noise, K3's noise blanker can work pretty well but P3's > screen is covered by noise. In contrast, the noise blanker on SDR-IQ was > extraordinary, allowing to see weak signals in the present of heavy noise. > At least two solutions here: 1) request a feature from Elecraft, or 2) > call the power company. > > I had many of software crashes with SDR-IQ. Perhaps no longer with new > computer and new drivers but I have lost enough time... > > To tell the truth, the support of LP-PAN is more helpful than the support > of SDR-IQ. > > Ignacy, NO9E > -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558549.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
