IMHO, those who want "studio quality" SSB should obtain a commercial
broadcasting license and use that instead of using the ham bands for
"wideband SSB". Not only is it wasted bandwidth, but it is QRM to
adjacent stations. My opinion of AM on the ham bands is similar.
Technology has advanced to the point where minimum bandwidth to achieve
effective communications is all that should be used, and an audio
bandwidth of 300 to 2600 Hz is more than adequate for good communications.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 1/27/2013 11:47 PM, Richard Fjeld wrote:
I have watched ESSB signals on the P3 and I have this question; most receivers
are limited to as narrow as 2.1 KHz, commonly 2.8 KHz on SSB. That is about
all they are going to hear when listening to a wide ESSB signal. Unless
someone with ESSB is in qso with a station of the same width, isn't it going to
be wasted bandwidth?
Rich, n0ce
----- Original Message -----
From: Matt Zilmer
To: Mike Markowski
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] ESSB Equalization
It works quite well too! Looks like Wide SSB TX and plain SSB TX are
always left with the same profile.
73,
matt W6NIA
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
