Let's end of the ESSB debate thread. Eric List Moderator elecraft.com _..._
On Jan 27, 2013, at 9:17 PM, Scott Manthe <[email protected]> wrote: > Wasted bandwidth, indeed. This is not the place to debate "ESSB." It's a dead > horse that has been beaten from the pasture to the glue factory. > > 73, > Scott, N9AA > > > On 1/28/13 12:07 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >> IMHO, those who want "studio quality" SSB should obtain a commercial >> broadcasting license and use that instead of using the ham bands for >> "wideband SSB". Not only is it wasted bandwidth, but it is QRM to adjacent >> stations. My opinion of AM on the ham bands is similar. Technology has >> advanced to the point where minimum bandwidth to achieve effective >> communications is all that should be used, and an audio bandwidth of 300 to >> 2600 Hz is more than adequate for good communications. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
