Matt -- I'm not even sure I'd call the lack of memory on the KAT3 on those far-out frequencies a "problem". For me, at least, it's curiosity and potentially useful information in the future.
The only time the lack of memory has been inconvenient is when I've joined SHARES nets in progress (and have to remember to go aside and tune first, since SHARES tends to be further away from the amateur bands), or when bouncing around during the Armed Forces Day test. -- *Michael D. Adams* (N1EN) Poquonock, Connecticut | [email protected] On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Matt Zilmer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Well, for those close-in freqs, it's not been a problem here. I was > thinking around 11 or 12 MHz where there isn't a ham band in sight for > a considerable span. > > 73, > matt W6NIA > > On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:22:11 -0500, you wrote: > > >Matt -- > > > >That's something that I've wondered myself, for similar reasons. > > > >I have noticed that the MARS frequencies closest to the amateur bands > (e.g. > >low 4MHz) are remembered by the KAT3, while those further outside (e.g. > >high 4MHz) are not. > > > >At this point, I know by experience which of the frequencies I regularly > >use do/don't need to tuned up. But for those times when I might need to > >use other frequencies.... it could be handy information to have. > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
