As soon as everyone standardises on N types the better, easy to make, splash 
proof, constant impedance, easily available, industry standard, rugged, it's a 
no brainer...

Best regards, Tim Hague
Skype m0afj.Tim
Sent on my iPad


On 27 Apr 2013, at 00:50, Don Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jeff,
> 
> There are a number of amateurs who just do not like BNC connectors and will 
> not use them.  In fact I have heard some comment when looking at a K2/10 say 
> "That antenna connector MUST be changed to a UHF type".  While I do not 
> agree, it is a perception that must be dealt with at Elecraft.  Couple that 
> with the fact that BNC is largely the 'standard' for QRP transceivers, but 
> not for 100 watt and over rigs where the UHF connector reigns supreme.
> 
> Adapters are not a problem IMHO, they can just stay on the SO-239 jack and 
> usually do not get in the way.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
> On 4/26/2013 7:36 PM, Jeff Herr wrote:
>> I will end up taking the units (kx3 and that nice amp) with me as I travel.
>> 
>> In effect now we are forced to need adapters.
>> 
>> Do you think BNC connection is not suitable from an engineering perspective?
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to