So..."Just Learn Morse Code" 73, Deni F5VJC
On 20 June 2013 00:00, Don Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote: > And CW that is not perfectly sent will give most any CW decoder "fits". > The best CW decoder is the human brain, it is more tolerant of > imperfections in timing and band conditions than any other decoder. > > I just tried the K3 decoder on a W1AW bulletin broadcast, and with the QRN > on the 40 meter band, copy was not perfect, but it was reasonable. My head > could fill in the blanks easily. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > > On 6/19/2013 5:47 PM, Robert G Strickland wrote: > >> Sam... >> In my *limited* experience with the K3 decoder, I have found that the >> quality of the sent cw is a big factor in effective decoding. For example, >> leaving all radio settings constant, one signal will decode perfectly, >> while another of the same strength and general speed will be gibberish. >> Another test is to copy W1AW code practice; decodes perfectly every time >> here. Of course, that is machine sent code. Signals sent at speed using a >> bug/Vibroflex seem to give the decoder a fit. >> ...robert >> >> > ______________________________**______________________________**__ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: > http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/elecraft<http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htm<http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> > Post: mailto:[email protected].**net <[email protected]> > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
