For JT65, WSPR, etc. I just use the narrowest filter when on frequency and the P3 to see where signals are. In my case, that filter is the 250 Hz.
With the K3, remember that you're not selecting a filter so much as setting a bandwidth. Filters kick in as they're called for, and this is slaved to the WIDTH or LO/HI control. You can also force a filter selection (as with the K2) using the XFIL switch, but doing so forces the WIDTH set to the rated filter bandwidth at the same time. 73, matt W6NIA On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 11:00:33 +0100, you wrote: >Since this subject is current (and likely always will be!) I have to ask the >learned brethren which filter does experience show to be best for use with >JT65 mode. I currently only have the standard issue 2.7KHz filter, which of >course works OK for everything (except I suppose DSB and FM). If I used CW I >would definitely choose a narrow-band filter, but the waterfall display used >for JT65, PSK31 etc. might lead me to rely on a 2-3KHz filter for these >modes, even though the signal bandwidths are much narrower. My question is: >is anyone using narrower roofing filters and tuning across the waterfall to >squeeze the most out of those DX data stations? Or am I being dumb? > > > >Ray Coles, C.Eng. M0XDL > >10 Littlemoor Road, > >Weymouth DT3 6AA > >Tel: +44 (0) 1305 833699 > >Mob: 07831 516517 > > > > > > > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
