Both the PAR omniangle and the doublet are excellent antennas. The 44 ft doublet on 17 meters has a pattern with several sharp lobes, and its gain will vary considerably depending upon which direction the signal is coming from. In some directions it will be significantly better than the Omniangle, and in some directions significantly worse. I believe that this is likely what Stan was experiencing with the contact in his video.
The obvious advantage of the Omniangle is size. The big advantage of the doublet is easy multi-band operation (with the tuner). Its gain vs. desired direction can be either an advantage or disadvantage. 73 Craig AC0DS Craig Smith 1009 Alder Way Longmont, CO 80503 [email protected] 303-834-7712 On 26, Sep2013, at 10:33 AM, Vic K2VCO wrote: > How high was the 44' doublet? > > How was it oriented compared to the Omni Angle antenna? > > Is the doublet in inverted V or horizontal configuration? > > I am finding this interesting because I am soon moving to an > antenna-restricted location. > > On 9/26/2013 6:57 AM, stan levandowski wrote: >> About 3 weeks ago, I learned about a new "miracle antenna" - I usually >> dismiss such >> nonsense because there *is* no miracle antenna. However, the person who >> informed me is a >> trusted, capable, educated ham and DXpeditioner who is not easily impressed. >> >> I still don't believe in "miracles" but this 2.5 lb, 7 by 4 foot, easy >> up/easy down, no >> tools required, easy-to-tune $99 new product by Dale Parfitt [designer of >> the PAR End >> FedZ series] offers a realistic alternative to those with severe antenna >> restrictions, >> attic installations, SOTA needs, and so on. It is easily mounted on a >> Jackite or similar >> fiberglass pole. Just put it on and slide it down until it's a good friction >> fit. >> >> The antenna is resonant for a single band ( choose: 20, 17, 15, 12, 10 or 6) >> and >> additional matchboxes can be purchased for around $25 each. >> >> I bought the 17 meter version and in two weeks of non-scientific, casual A/B >> testing >> against my 44' doublet, the Omni Angle has been equal or better on receive >> the majority of >> times and about the same on transmit. On receive it seems notaby less noisy >> than my >> doublet. It is horizontally polarized. >> >> I don't want to create an antenna controversy here on proper antenna testing >> techniques -- >> I seem to have a flair for doing that -- ;) >> >> But I do want to pass along info on this new product which might be very >> useful to those >> of us who have to live with antenna restrictions or who need options for >> effective >> portable operations. >> >> Here is a short Youtube video I cobbled together to demonstrate my 17 meter >> PAR Omni Angle. >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGTq4zVAW_w >> >> 73, Stan WB2LQF >> >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > -- > Vic, K2VCO > Fresno CA > http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
