On 5/9/2014 1:26 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
Likewise, after your glowing recommendation of the US100, I bought one.

Hi Wes,

I did my testing with JT65HF on he HF bands, with the K3 output feeding both one Thinkpad internal sound card and the Tascam feeding a second Thinkpad. I did the same comparison between the Numark and internal, then between the Tascam and the Numark. My criteria was the number of good decodes for each 1 minute pass. The Tascam and Numark boxes consistently decoded twice as many signals per 1 minute pass. The internal sound card rarely decoded a signal weaker than an indicated -12, whereas the Tascam and Numark regularly decoded additional signals down to -20, with occasional -22 decodes. I attribute that to better performance near the bottom of the A/D. When comparing the two USB boxes to each other, roughly once in ten passes, one would decode a signal that the other would not, but neither was better than the other -- on one pass the Tascam would miss a station that the Numark copied, then 5-10 minutes later the Numark would miss a station that the Tascam copied. This was quite extensive -- in addition to watching the nigher bands, I even let them run overnight on 160, then compare decodes the next morning.

I found performance "a bit better" with RTTY, but did no equivalent testing to substantiate that, because I found the JT65 results far more quantifiable and repeatable. So for RTTY contesting, the Tascam is on one rig feeding one laptop, and the Numark is on the other rig, feeding the other laptop. Now that we have 2Tone as an alternative to MMTTY, I've been running three decode windows per radio, and the most I can say to describe the result is that they are about equally good, but on almost every pass, one of the windows will copy something that one of both of the others missed, not no consistent advantage I've been able to discern to one over the other. The real advantage is that you have three looks at the same signal, so you tend to ask for far fewer repeats, AND I have changed to not repeating the exchange. I notice W0YK doing the same.

73, Jim K9YC


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to