------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped) ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:38:19 -0400, w4tv wrote: > It >when the amplifier designer insists on polling without providing the >necessary hardware support that problems start. REPLY: Makes sense. So, would it be better for an amplifier to have two ports: 1. A receive-only port for band changes 2. A send-only port for monitoring such as temperature, power output, SWR and whatever else is desired. When you're paying many thousand $$$ for an amp, the cost of an extra port seems negligible. Or is there a better way? 73, Bill W6WRT ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
