Ted,
If you will always operate at the 100 watt level, I will suggest that
you will be happier with the K3/100 with KAT3. Quicker and easier to
set up at your 'portable' location.
OTOH, if you also want the flexibility of operating QRP with a handheld
transceiver that can be powered from batteries, then the KX3 with
KXPA100 and KXAT100 would be the better solution.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 1/3/2015 5:57 PM, Dauer, Edward wrote:
I know this is largely a matter of opinion, but I welcome that of anyone
who is familiar with both the K3 series and the KX3 series:
I operate at two QTHs. At one I run the K3 (with subRx etc) plus KPA500,
KAT-500, and P3. That one is staying as-is.
At the other QTH I have been using a KX3, which has the advantage of
portability (mobiling) but I find the QRP limiting when I can¹t get to the
first QTH during a contest. The choice
then is to add the KXPA100 with KXAT100 to the KX3, or to simply replace
the KX3 with another K3 (barefoot) at the 2nd QTH.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
