I don't believe that is totally accurate. I'm guessing you're not an
active contester. The K3 is pretty good, but it most definitely does
not have infinite capability to suit any situation. Last I checked, low
level pass band mixing was still an issue, as is the hard audio limit
for some.
Dave AB7E
On 2/26/2015 4:06 AM, Bill wrote:
If you don't like the audio from your K3 - you don't have to keep it!
With all the various AGC, DSP, and filter settings - and the two
equalizers - _your_ K3 can be made to sound any way _you_ want it to
sound.
It used to be that some radios just plain sounded good or just plain
lousy - for whatever reason(s). The K3 can be anything from lousy to
excellent - it is all up to the user to make the adjustments. Nothing
is fixed in the K3 - there are nearly infinite variables to suit any
situation. You can set it up for weak signal CW or resounding armchair
copy - the choice is yours. The K3 can do it all.
Now, just why is it that I keep seeing mention of the K3's poor audio?
Sounds to me like it is more the operator is unable to make the
necessary menu selections. Or, more likely, the complainer never
actually heard a K3.
Now, back to 75 meters and a little Kool-Aide.
Bill W2BLC K-Line
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
