Yep, that would be cool, although I'm not sure it's doable. Would
likely work if you were switching bands often, but if you don't come
back to a band in a reasonable time, the "average" may be as invalid as
REF LVL currently is.
I generally take K9YC's advice if it pertains to audio, sometimes I'm a
little slower on non-audio things. Jim runs P3 spectrum averaging as
high as it will go. I never did ... fascination with the jumping
spectrum display?
I'm currently running at 12 for the spectrum and OFF for the WF and the
WF is what I look at and I like the results. I find I don't have to
adjust the REF LVL nearly as much. Having found out that 12 is safe for
averaging, I may push it up. But, seriously, to my surprise, it really
does tend to hold the REF LVL much more constant which is what I was
looking for in the first place.
73,
Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015
- www.cqp.org
On 3/6/2015 4:56 AM, Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO wrote:
I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to the
noise level.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
