Barry - It will be interesting to hear from someone who has done that... but I put two new synth boards in the K3 of W9FAM, and he is THRILLED at being able to run QRQ without having to be in the QRQ mode, thus being able to use RIT, without degradation of the CW his K3 is putting out.
For him that is important every moment he is on the air... He realizes he may never be aware of receive improvement, but knows the upgrade was well worth it. In my case, I seldom go over 30 wpm, so I did not need the upgrade the way he did, but I am still glad I did it. I may never know how differently my rig actually performs, but it "seems" quieter. I realize that could be just because I want to justify the upgrade, but I am a very happy camper regardless. Dave - K9FN On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Barry <[email protected]> wrote: > All this talk about better numbers is great, but has anyone done a side by > side comparison of on the air differences? That's what I'd like to hear > about. > Barry W2UP > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-Sherwood-Receiver-Test-Data-question-tp7599908p7599927.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [email protected] > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
