There are NO statutes of limitations on this sort
of thing, Wayne :-)
73, Phil W7OX
On 7/30/15 3:24 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
I thought we'd hit the statute of limitations on this one. Thanks for the
reminder.
tnx
Wayne
N6KR
On Jul 30, 2015, at 2:02 PM, Wes (N7WS) <[email protected]> wrote:
This inconvenience was brought up a long time ago.
Wayne said, "Filter bandwidth is stored per-mode. At present, all data sub-modes
share the same bandwidth. I'll look at what would be required to split them out."
July 5, 2010.
On 7/30/2015 1:13 AM, Ian White wrote:
This links into another problem about data bandwidths: unlike the
specific DATA sub-mode, the associated passband settings are not saved
per-band.
Whenever you select DATA, the stored SHIFT and WIDTH settings will
always be the last settings that were used for *any* data sub-mode on
*any* other band... which may often be quite inappropriate.
This is a particular inconvenience for all users who switch frequently
between narrowband data modes on HF and wider-band modes on 6m and
above.
(It obviously isn't a major problem; I only mention it in case Elecraft
might be revisiting this area of code.)
73 from Ian GM3SEK
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
