Don, et al:

I do agree that we typically do not need a precision load nor do we likely need a "full legal limit CCS" load. Most loads have a power vs. time de-rating curve. Just following that practice will save on lots of $$ and space.

Yes the Cantenna loads are generally suitable. I find the Z to be 50 ohms +/- 10% or so. They will handle legal limit power for 2 or3 minutes and 100 to 300 watt power for almost CCS times. As a rule, they are good for HF and become a bit less so suitable for VHF.

I prefer dry loads as they are less "messy" where one uses an oil filled load it seems they all want to weep a bit. Oh my gosh should on kick one over and the lid separate. As a suggestion, solder the lid in place at 3 or 4 locations around the edge.

It would do well for folks to consider switching and tuning methods so as not to put a signal on the air. Although this typically can't be done with automatic type tuners, with manual tuners, using an antenna bridge will allow one to adjust the tuner for a proper match and not put a signal on the air. Then with older amps, tuning those into a dummy load again will not put a signal on the air. When the amp is switched to the tuner then all is well and no QRM has been generated.

73 Bob, K4TAX

K3S s/n 10,163


On 9/17/2015 8:37 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
While a dummy load that has a power rating greater than your maximum transmit power is a worthwhile addition to any hamshack - at higher power levels, I do not see them being used as precision measurement devices, but only as a temporary load for the purposes of "tuning up" or operating into a dummy load for test purposes.

While the "Tune Up" situation has been largely eliminated for "No Tune" amplifiers, there is still the question of how to do a TUNE into an antenna when you have a tuner such as the KAT500 in line - but that tunes into the antenna at reduced power with the Elecraft K-line, and the tune cycle is relatively short.

The net that I see of all that is one does not need a precision dummy load for high power levels. At the 100 watt level, I do find a need for precision dummy loads which can be used for lab measurement devices, bu at higher power levels in the normal hamshack, I do not understand a need for a precise 50 ohm non-inductive load (as long as you do not stray too far from that 50 ohm point.

In other words, the gallon size "cantenna" dummy loads should suffice for most purposes in the ham shack that I can conceive of - primarily providing a suitable load for a high power transmitter for routine test purposes.

Those who do precision measurements at high power levels will have to invest in precision dummy loads, but for typical ham use, I don't think that level of precision is necessary. Such precision comes at a cost.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 9/17/2015 8:19 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
I'd love to find Elecraft offering a 500W dummy load to match the K-Line.
No one even makes a sturdy paint can anymore.

73, Byron
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]





______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to