Hi Ken, When they issue a revised Figure 10 for the article, we'll put it on our website.
73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:07 AM, Ken Chandler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Wayne > Would like to view both ARRL (old v new) synth plots side by side if > possible! > Don't subscribe to ARRL, so not privy to that info!! > > Ken.. G0ORH - M3i > > Sent from my iPad > > >> On 20 Oct 2015, at 01:03, Wayne Burdick <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> You may have noticed that QST recently reviewed the K3's performance >> before/after swapping in a new KSYN3A synthesizer. While the review text was >> accurate (and complimentary), there was a significant error in the KSYN3A TX >> phase noise plot (Figure 10). This error made it appear as if the original >> synthesizer had lower (better) wide-spaced phase noise than the KSYN3A >> (starting where the plot lines cross), which is not the case. >> >> We should have caught this ourselves before the article went to print. We >> greatly appreciated the League's efforts to determine the source of error -- >> equipment setup -- and re-test. The digital-print version of QST will be >> corrected, and a correction will also appear in the December QST. >> >> The ARRL sent us the revised TX phase noise plot for the K3+KSYN3A that they >> tested. You can see it here: >> >> >> http://www.elecraft.com/specs/Joel's%20K3%2010-19-15%2020%20meter%20phase%20noise.BMP >> >> In addition they're testing a K3S. Its TX phase noise plot looks as good or >> slightly better: >> >> >> http://www.elecraft.com/specs/K3S%2010-19-15%20%2020%20meter%20phase%20noise.BMP ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
