I wish the transmitted noise was presented more like a proof of performance.
One line for the FCC requirement, then a broad line showing the curves of the three best rigs tested so far. That would give a clear view of whether this transmitter was just barely good enough or among the best. wunder K6WRU CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Oct 20, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Scott Manthe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe. Or maybe the copy editor is a fan of Flex gear. 😊 > > Rick, K2XT is correct. Not to go off the deep end here, but a simple > correction doesn't undo the damage to Elecraft's reputation that this "error" > appearing in print has caused. QST really should reprint the entire review > with an explanation of why it is doing that. Maybe they need to reassess (yet > again) the quality control in their editorial process. > > 73, > Scott N9AA > > On 10/20/15 4:08 PM, Bill wrote: >> This is what happens when there is less then careful/knowledgeable proof >> reading. >> >> Bill W2BLC K-Line >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [email protected] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
