Bob, Thanks for asking, I too have struggled to understand the need given I only use the original digital mode, CW and SSB.
:-) Gary -----Original Message----- From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <[email protected]> Sent: 3/11/2015 7:56 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 mHZ external reference VS the K3S's optionalKTCXO3-1 Yes, I've been following this as well. And to that end, I have a commercial GPS Disciplined Oscillator that is used as a reference for the test equipment in the shop. In checking my K3s I find, with the optional TCXO, the accuracy is typically +/-2 Hz on all bands. Few if many other transceivers will display or maintain this stand-a-lone accuracy. So I ask, what's the obsession with accuracy better than this for amateur use? 73 Bob, K4TAX On 11/2/2015 2:34 PM, Doug Hensley wrote: > I've been following the thread on using a 10 mHZ external reference and the > prospect seems both affordable and at least initially fun BUT I'd like to ask > is it really a practical improvement over Elecraft's available KTCXO3 > internal 1ppm reference? Or is this just a way to achieve more accuracy at > less cost than the KTCXO3 ? Isn't the K3S better served with its own > oscillator? What am I missing here? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
