Most of my CW work is for eme where the signal is marginal "at
best". Without having a large SNR on the signal I have not found any
CW decoder to work well (skimmer seems to be best). On CW-eme the
output is gibberish.
Inventing a digital code designed for weak-signal is way better
solution (eg JT65) and it decodes down 10-dB weaker than most folks
can hear CW (I need another +6 dB for human CW copy). Good CW ops
prefer CW as it is "more fun" than digital - no argument.
So, CW was designed for human decoding and that still remains the
best solution.
73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
"Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag business:
[email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
