Folks - In the interest of relieving our list readers from severe single topic
email overload, let's end this thread now.
While an interesting topic with lots of good comments, its had a -huge- number
of postings. It is time to give it a rest.
(I would have jumped in earlier yesterday, but I was extremely busy at my other
job - making the best all around radios in the world :-)
73,
Eric
Elecraft list moderator
/elecraft.com/
On 4/27/2016 5:26 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
On 4/26/2016 11:48 PM, Barry LaZar wrote:
> You touch on the real problem 14-16 bits of sampling vice having
> more bits in the sample. It's not specifically the direct sampling
> architecture.
The real problem is not enough bits. DSR proponents continue to ignore
the sensitivity vs. overload trade-off. They tout their "top of the
list" IMD performance and "multiple slice receiver" capabilities while
completely hiding the fact that those items can only be accomplished by
reducing sensitivity some 30 dB compared to a conventional superhet
receiver in the presence of strong signals.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
