Don, LP-PAN advertises noise reduction. Does the P3 do similar?
John WA1EAZ Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 4, 2016, at 11:27 AM, Don Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bill, > > The least frustration route is to use the P3 with the SVGA option (and > perhaps the TXMON option). > > Certainly the LP-Pan/NaP3 or Win4K3 route will be less expensive, but > requires getting the applications working right on the computer. > > So the tradeoff is between using the hardware solution of the P3 vs. using > LP-Pan/NaP3 which involves computer setup of the soundcard and all the > attendant frustration that comes with getting everything to play together. > > If I had a MM station, I would go for the P3, but if you have enough patience > to work with the LP-Pan?NaP3 solution, the end result will be similar. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > >> On 7/4/2016 8:25 AM, Bill OMara via Elecraft wrote: >> I'm looking for some input on the best and most cost effective way to add >> panadapters to my MM contest station with four K3's. >> >> I currently have one of the four station outfitted with a LP PAN2 and NaP3 >> SW and it works fine with the internal sound card with 48Khz bandwidth. >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [email protected] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
