The reason your antenna was a lot less finicky with a bit of coax is that the
EFHW antenna requires a return path for the RF field. Theoretically, without
a return path, the antenna won't radiate at all. The recommended setup for
this antenna is for a .05 wavelength counterpoised to be used. EZNEC models
indicate that there is little benefit to going much longer than .05
wavelengths, and a quarter wavelength is actually less effective than the
shorter lengths.  If no counterpoise is used, then coax shield becomes the
counterpoise by default.

Bill  N0CU



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/EFHW-tp7626554p7626577.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to