I like WSJT-X but I use JTDX as much or more. It adds some interesting features to the decoding. WSJT-X interface is a little more polished but JTDX isn't bad.
Read about different versions and try them out before discounting them because someone says so. 73, Kev K4VD On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Jim Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun,5/28/2017 12:18 AM, Richard Lamont wrote: > >> I agree with all of that, except the 'unauthorized' bit. >> > > Joe has posted on that topic. The executive summary is that he is not > happy with the way in which some of those other developers have failed to > respect his license. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [email protected] > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
