I did a comprehensive test of the K3S noise reduction system and uploaded the same document to the Elecraft_K3 Yahoo group.
Elecraft_K3_NoiseReduction.pdf <http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/file/n7631913/Elecraft_K3_NoiseReduction.pdf> Here's what I concluded. Settings Fn-1 provides the least noise reduction. Fn-2 and Fn-3 noise levels are almost the same and one setting could be eliminated. Fn-4 provides the most noise reduction and having 3 settings, it would simplifying NR adjustments. The NR delays that is, F1-n through F4-n, could be added to the configuration menu. There are delay differences in the noise ripple but aurally, with a complex voice waveform, there’s no distinction between the delay settings. Don't get me wrong! I'm not that saying there's something wrong with the K3/K3S noise reduction. It works very well! I think there are too many settings and some can be eliminated. What are your thoughts? ----- Jack WA9FVP Sent from my home-brew I5 Core PC -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-Noise-reduction-Test-tp7631913.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
