To what productive/beneficial end? ______________________ Clay Autery, KY5G
On 6/20/2017 10:48 AM, wa9fvp wrote: > I did a comprehensive test of the K3S noise reduction system and uploaded the > same document to the Elecraft_K3 Yahoo group. > > > Elecraft_K3_NoiseReduction.pdf > <http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/file/n7631913/Elecraft_K3_NoiseReduction.pdf> > > > Here's what I concluded. > > Settings Fn-1 provides the least noise reduction. Fn-2 and Fn-3 noise > levels are almost the same and one setting could be eliminated. Fn-4 > provides the most noise reduction and having 3 settings, it would > simplifying NR adjustments. The NR delays that is, F1-n through F4-n, could > be added to the configuration menu. There are delay differences in the > noise ripple but aurally, with a complex voice waveform, there’s no > distinction between the delay settings. > > > Don't get me wrong! I'm not that saying there's something wrong with the > K3/K3S noise reduction. It works very well! I think there are too many > settings and some can be eliminated. What are your thoughts? > > > > ----- > Jack WA9FVP ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
