Thank you very much John. 

Very 73 - Mike - k9JRI







> On May 28, 2018, at 1:39 PM, John Oppenheimer <j...@kn5l.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> An EZNEC model using 30 feet AGL and Q=200 for the coils, has a very
> close match the the reported values.
> 
> 20M, the antenna does not seem to degrade form a simple dipole with a
> Gain of about 6 dBi at about 30 degrees elevation.
> 
> 80M, it's about 5 dBi at 90 degrees elevation. Expected from a low
> dipole. The impedance at resonance is about 25 Ohm, so should have a SWR
> about 2. A lower measured SWR may be the result of other system loses.
> 
> I'd suggest this antenna is a good option for the constraints imposed.
> 
> John KN5L
> 
> On 05/28/2018 11:39 AM, Michael Blake wrote:
>> The center sections of the dipole are tuned for resonance at about 14.15 MHz 
>> and the end sections, past the loading inductors on each dipole leg, are 
>> tuned for resonance a 3.7 MHz.  The resonance dips at both frequencies are 
>> quite sharp and the SWR on both bands is less than 1.5 to 1.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to k9...@mac.com

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to