On 5/28/2018 10:39 AM, John Oppenheimer wrote:
An EZNEC model using 30 feet AGL and Q=200 for the coils, has a very
close match the the reported values.

While SWR and driving Z values may be correct, there was an excellent piece 2-part piece in QEX 3-4 years ago showing that NEC does not correctly model phase shift through inductors, thus producing wrong answers for field strength (i.e., how well the antenna WORKS). This is a shortcoming of the NEC code, and is unrelated to the user interface like EZNEC/ELNEC and 4NEC2.

The antenna he was studying was a loaded mobile whip for HF. The first part of the article was a serious engineering description of the test setup, including the measurement system. The second described a carefully controlled study, using that measurement system, of inductive loading at the base, midway, and fairly high on the vertical radiator, as well as capacitive top loading. He compared measured results with the NEC model. As I recall, differences between modeled and measured data were as much as 10-14 dB for bottom loading.

In addition to exposing the limitation of NEC, the major conclusion from his study was that because radiation is produced by current and current is greatest near the feedpoint, a design that provides the greatest vertical height before the loading element(s) will generally be the most efficient (that is, produce the loudest signal). Those who have long been serious about HF mobile antennas have known this for years. At least as long as 20 years ago, W8JI has written a lot about this. In that time frame, my buddy K9IKZ told me about an annual conclave of HF mobile station builders convened in southern Indiana to do "shootouts" of their designs.

73, Jim K9YC



______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to